The popularity of @irys_xyz is on a straight upward trajectory, and many people's understanding of Irys is still superficial. Its emergence is not just about moving hard drives around, but about transforming data into executable programs that can be called directly by contracts with rules. 🎯 Core Positioning Old storage solves "how to store," while Irys solves "how to use." Filecoin: Decentralized hard drive, focused on long-term retention. Walrus: High throughput in Sui, but limited in cross-ecosystem and execution capabilities. Irys: Data-native programmability, allowing direct writing of permissions, billing, distribution, and compliance rules. 💰 Cost Pricing Approximate scale: Storing 100GB for 5 years, Irys ≈ $56, traditional cloud ≈ $1656, a difference of about 30 times. The price difference comes from structural differences, as decentralization spreads costs across global nodes. Filecoin: Long-term costs can be low, but retrieval and latency need to match market conditions. Arweave: One-time purchase for "permanence," suitable for archiving, but not economical for frequent read/write. Irys: Priced based on "programmable usage," settling read/write verification and execution together to reduce hidden costs. ⚡️ Technical Usability The core of the dual ledger: Submit: Fast forward, verify, sort first; Publish: Then persist, traceable. Both fast and stable, supporting data as executable objects. Developers can directly write permissions, billing, distribution, rules, and other logic on the data; maintaining EVM compatibility with low migration costs. This differs from Filecoin's storage focus, Arweave's archiving focus, and Walrus's specific ecosystem acceleration path. @irys_xyz is upgrading files to smart data units with billing and permissions. When data is executable, tradable, traceable, and auditable, market competition will shift from "capacity and price" to "conversion rate and cash flow."